Thanks for your letter with the corrections of my blunders.
Dr. med. James Kirsch
Berlin W.15
Olivaer Pl. 3
20 August 1931
Dear Dr. Jung!
Please accept my heartiest thanks for your letter with the corrections of my blunders.
I was very pleased that you were able to read my lecture so quickly, and would be equally delighted if you would retrieve Fraulein Geitel’s essay on “Psychic Images in Children” from the mountain of manuscripts.
By the way, I collaborated extensively on that essay. I’d also be most grateful if you would say something briefly about the Schultz exercises that I recently wrote you about.
From various sources I’ve heard that you won’t accept any patients this fall, so you can dedicate yourself to your projects.
All of us look forward very much to your new book.
Despite the heavy work load, would you be willing to arrange for a German Seminar again this year?
With cordial greetings also from my wife,
Very truly and gratefully yours,
JAMES KIRSCH ~James Kirsch, Jung-Kirsch Letters, Page 22
Letter to Bill Wilson from Carl Jung
C.G. Jung Letters, Vol. 1: 1906-1950
Dear Mr. Wilson
Your letter has been very welcome indeed.
I had no news from Roland H. anymore and often wondered what has been his fate. Our conversation which he has adequately reported to you had an aspect of which he did not know.
The reason that I could not tell him everything was that those days I had to be exceedingly careful of what I said. I had found out that I was misunderstood in every possible way. Thus I was very careful when I talked to Roland H. But what I really thought about was the result of many experiences with men of his kind.
His craving for alcohol was the equivalent, on a low level, of the spiritual thirst of our being for wholeness, expressed in medieval language: the union with God.
How could one formulate such an insight in a language that is not misunderstood in our days?
The only right and legitimate way to such an experience is that it happens to you in reality and it can only happen to you when you walk on a path which leads you to higher understanding. You might be led to that goal by an act of grace or through a personal and honest contact with friends, or through a higher education of the mind beyond the confines of mere rationalism. I see from your letter that Roland H. has chosen the second way, which was, under the circumstances, obviously the best one.
I am strongly convinced that the evil principle prevailing in this world leads the unrecognized spiritual need into perdition, if it is not counteracted either by real religious insight or by the protective wall of human community. An ordinary man, not protected by an action from above and isolated in society, cannot resist the power of evil, which is called very aptly the Devil. But the use of such words arouses so many mistakes that one can only keep aloof from them as much as possible.
These are the reasons why I could not give a full and sufficient explanation to Roland H., but I am risking it with you because I conclude from your very decent and honest letter that you have acquired a point of view above the misleading platitudes one usually hears about alcoholism.
You see, “alcohol” in Latin is “spiritus” and you use the same word for the highest religious experience as well as for the most depraving poison. The helpful formula therefore is: spiritus contra spiritum.
Thanking you again for your kind letter
I remain
Yours sincerely
C. G. Jung
