Carl Jung on the Superstition of Astrologers today.
Modern Psychology: C. G. Jung’s Lectures at the ETH Zürich, 1933-1941
This magic influence was attributed to the stars, it was assumed that they, as constituents of the eternal being, had magic qualities and sent out vibrations, so to speak, which influenced human destiny.
Even today astrologists superstitiously assume something of the same kind; but such ideas are illusory and cannot be proved.
There are certainly many inexplicable things in horoscopes, but they cannot possibly be explained by emanation of magic qualities from the stars or anything of that kind.
This is impossible, because the stars which appear in the horoscope are not really in that position at the moment of birth.
This is because we have an artificial reckoning of time, owing to the so-called “precession of the equinoxes.”
The spring point recedes 55 seconds every year, a problem which already teased the old Babylonians.
In order to keep the clocks right, so to speak, the astronomers (circa 100 B. C. when the sun was moving into the sign of the fishes) fixed the spring point at zero degrees Aries (in which it had already been for about 2000 years).
Since then it has remained fixed, though actually, instead of being in Aries, the sun is somewhere at the end of the fishes.
Horoscopes, therefore, are reckoned by an artificial sky, so to speak; and so the peculiar quality of the moment cannot possibly depend on the stars, but must belong to time itself. ~Carl Jung, ETH, Pages 197-205.
Carl Jung Letter on Astrology and Astrologers
Letters of C. G. Jung: Volume 2, 1951-1961
On Astrology and Astrologers Letter from Carl Jung to Robert L. Kroon:
Astrology is one of the intuitive methods like the I Ching, geomantics and other divinatory procedures. It is based upn the synchronicity principle, i.e., meaningful coincidence I have explored experimentally three intuitive methods: the method of the I Ching, geomantics and astrology.
Astrology is a naively projected psychology in which the different attitudes and temperaments of man are represented as gods and identified with planets and zodiacal constellations. While studying astrology I have applied it to concrete cases many times.
There are remarkable coincidences, e.g. the position of Mars in the zenith in the famous horoscope of Wilhelm II, the so-called “Friedenkaiser.” This position is said already in a medieval treatise to mean always a causa ab alto, a fall from the height.
The experiment is most suggestive to a versatile mind, unreliable in the hands of the unimaginative, and dangerous in the hands of a fool, as those intuitive methods always are. If intelligently used the experiment is useful in cases where it is a matter of an opaque structure.
It often provides surprising insights. The most definite limit of the experiment is a lack of intelligence and literal-mindedness of the observer. It is an intelligent apercu like the shape of the hand or the expression of the face—things of which a stupid and unimaginative mind can make nothing and from which a superstitious mind draws the wrong conclusions.
Astrological “truths” as statistical results are questionable or even unlikely.
The superstitious use [prediction of future or statement of facts beyond psychological possibilities) is false.
Astrology differs very much from alchemy, as its historical literature consists merely of different methods of casting a horoscope and of interpretation, and not of philosophical texts as is the case in alchemy.
There is not psychological exposition of astrology yet, on account of the fact that the empirical foundations in the sense of a science has not yet been laid. The reason for this is that astrology does not follow the principle of causality, but depends, like all intuitive methods, on acausality. Undoubtedly astrology today is flourishing as never before in the past, but it is still most unsatisfactorily explored despite very frequent use. It is an apt tool only when used intelligently. It is not at all fooproof and when used by a rationalistic and narrow mind it is a definite nuisance. ~Carl Jung, Letters Vol. II, dated November 13, 1958
