[Carl Jung on Post-Mortem contact with the Dead]
To Pastor Fritz Pfiifflin
Dear Pastor Pfaffiin, 10 January 1939
First of all I would like to express my heartfelt sympathy over the heavy loss that has befallen you.
Since you wish to know what I think about such experiences, I would like to point out before anything else that there was a direct connection between the event in Africa and your consciousness.
This is an undeniable fact and in my opinion there is only one explanation, namely that spatial distance is, in the psychic sense, relative.
In other words, physical space is not under all circumstances a definite datum but under certain conditions is also a psychic function.
One might call it psychically contractile.
We must suppose that the distance between your brother’s experience and your own was reduced to a minimum.
From similar experiences we must conclude that this nullification of space proceeds with great speed, so that perceptions of this kind occur almost simultaneously with the accident.
We can therefore speak of a psychic nullification of time as well.
We could also suppose that the victim of the accident sent out a kind of radio message.
But this is contradicted by the fact that occasionally details are “transmitted” which occurred only after the death-for instance, the decapitation of the body of one killed by being stabbed with a knife.
In that event there can be no question of a transmission by a dying man.
It is more probable that it is a perception by someone alive and seeing.
Hence the psychic nullification of space and time offers a much better explanation.
Accordingly the capacity to nullify space and time must somehow inhere in the psyche, or, to put it another way, the psyche does not exist wholly in time and space.
It is very probable that only what we call consciousness is contained in space and time, and that the rest of the psyche.
The unconscious, exists in a state of relative spacelessness and timelessness.
For the psyche this means a relative eternality and a relative non-separation from other psyches, or a oneness with them.
It is characteristic that your brother was amazed when you asked him whether he had sent you a message.
Obviously he had not sent a message because the relative non-existence of space and time made it unnecessary. (I have expressed similar thoughts in my essay “Seele und Tod” in Wirklichkeit der Seele.)
Now with regard to the exceedingly interesting conversation you had post mortem with your brother, it has all the characteristic features of these experiences.
For one thing, there is the peculiar preoccupation of the dead with the psychic states of other (dead) persons.
For another, the existence of (psychic) shrines or places of healing.
I have long thought that religious institutions, churches, monasteries, temples, etc. as well as rites and psychotherapeutic attempts at healing were modelled on (transcendental) postmortal psychic states-a real Ecclesia Spiritualis as the prototype of the Una Sancta upon earth.
In the East these ideas would be by no means unheard-of; Buddhist philosophy, for instance, has coined the concept of Sambhoga-Kaya for this psychic existence, namely the world of subtle forms which are to Nirmana-Kaya as the breath-body (subtle body) is to the material body.
The breath-world is thought of as an intermediate state between Nirmana-Kaya and Dharma Kaya.
In Dharma-Kaya, which symbolizes the highest state, the separation of forms is dissolved into absolute unity and formlessness.
These formulations are extremely valuable from the psychological point of view as they provide a fitting terminology for such experiences.
Naturally we can form no conception of a relatively timeless and spaceless existence, but, psychologically and empirically, it results in manifestations of the continual presence of the dead and their influence on our dream life.
I therefore follow up such experiences with the greatest attention, because they show many things we dream about in a very peculiar light, where “psychological” structures appear as existential conditions.
This continual presence is also only relative, since after a few weeks or months the connection becomes indirect or breaks off altogether, although spontaneous re-encounters also appear to be possible later.
But after this period the feeling of the presence of the dead is in fact broken off.
The connection is not without its dangers because it entangles the consciousness of the living too much in that transcendental state, resulting in unconsciousness and dissociation phenomena .
This is reflected in your dream-vision of the path leading down to a lake (the unconscious).
There is an antheap, i.e., the sympathetic nervous system (= deepest unconsciousness and danger of dissolution of psychic elements in the form of milling ants) is becoming activated .
This state takes place in you, consequently the connection is in danger of being broken, hence your brother’s admonition : “Always build on the heights!” i.e., on the heights of consciousness.
“For us the depth is doom,” i.e., unconsciousness is doom.
Then we get into the “clouds” where one sees nothing more.
The remarkable statement that “Someone was interested in the motor cutting out” could indicate that among the crew there was someone who, through an exteriorization effect, actually caused the motor to cut out and did so because of an unrealized suicide complex.
(I have seen quite a number of such effects in my time.)
With regard to contact with your brother, I would add that this is likely to be possible only as long as the feeling of the presence of the dead continues.
But it should not be experimented with because of the danger of a disintegration of consciousness.
To be on the safe side, one must be content with spontaneous experiences.
Experimenting with this contact regularly leads either to the so-called communications becoming more and more stupid or to a dangerous dissociation of consciousness.
All the signs indicate that your conversation with your brother is a genuine experience which cannot be “psychologized.”
The only “psychological” disturbance in it is the lake and the antheap.
That was evidently the moment when, perhaps from both sides, the exceedingly difficult contact between the two forms of existence could no longer be maintained.
There are experiences which show that the dead entangle themselves, so to speak, in the physiology (sympathetic nervous system) of the living.
This would probably result in states of possession.
Again with especial thanks for your extremely interesting letter,
C.G. Jung [Letters Volume 1, Pages 256-259]