FROM CHARLES BAUDOUIN’S JOURNAL: 1934
Introduction: Charles Baudouin (1893-1963), professor in the University of Geneva, was founder there of the Institut de Psychagogie, whose patrons were Freud, Adler, and Jung and whose program was correspondingly catholic.
Eventually, Baudouin associated himself with the school of analytical psychology as an analyst, teacher, and writer.
His posthumous book L’Oeuvre de Jung (1963) contains, in a chapter entitled “Jung, homme concret,” a number of passages from Baudouin’s journal, reporting his, encounters with Jung over more than twenty years.
The earliest one was written after Baudouin attended a seminar that Jung gave to the Societe de Psychologie in Basel, October i–6, 1934.
That version, slightly abridged, was translated and published as “Jung, the Concrete Man” in the Friends an- nual Inward Light (Washington), fall–winter, 1975-76.
It is further abridged here. (For other extracts see pp. 146, 19o, 235, 365.) Charles Baudouin: Basel, Sunday, October 7, 1934
It is time to assemble the impressions which Jung’s personality has left upon me during these few days, to bind the sheaf, to present the portrait.
A standing portrait, emphatically, for I see him on his feet, talking and teaching. The word “stature” is what springs to mind, or the German word “Gestalt.”
This is no man of study or oﬃce; this is a force.
One of the anecdotes with which he bespangles his lectures stands out for me.
I hope I shall not do it an injusticde by repeating it from memory.different from all one knows, it is another matter.
Jung knew, from his interpreter, of his hosts’ embarrassment at having failed to identify him.
However, he won their hearts suﬃciently for them to invite him one day—a sign of conﬁdence and welcome— to visit the upper story of the house.
This meant climbing a ladder.
But while the Indians mount with their backs to the ladder and with the agility of monkeys, he naturally climbed in European fashion, facing the ladder, setting his feet deliberately on the rungs and presenting to the onlookers his square, powerful back.
A great clamor broke out then among the Indians, which he later had explained to him. On seeing him mount that way, they had recognized his totem: the bear! the bear!
He had the wit to enter into the spirit of the thing, and his understanding of “primitives” was advanced enough for him to feel all the seriousness of it.
Substantially, he told them: “Yes, you have guessed aright; the bear is the totem of my country; it has given its name to our capital, Bern; it ﬁgures in the coat of arms of the city.”
And on his return to Switzerland he sent them, as evidence and as a souvenir, a little wooden bear such as we carve over here.
He received in return and as a pledge of friendship, if I remember rightly, a pair of leather breeches.
These last days, telling us about the tribes, the spirits of the forest, that other world of mystery that comes alive suddenly at nightfall, he has been more like the sorcerer penetrated by the spirits he talks about, skilled at evoking them and making their disquieting presence hover above the suspenseful audience.
Then, all of a sudden, a good story will release the tension with a well-placed laugh.
His is a compact force that is fed by a substantial sum of human experience and ﬂows back to him as though
multiplied by the response of his own tribe, this circle of disciples from both continents who surround and sustain him.
Unkind gossip has accused these disciples and auditors of snobbery.
To be sure there is some of it, as there was around the courses which Bergson gave at the College de France; which is no argument against Bergson, nor yet against Jung.
But when someone raised the objection that a majority of his disciples were women, Jung is said to have replied: “What’s to be done?
Psychology is after all the science of the soul, and it is not my fault if the soul is a woman.”
A jest; but for anyone who has followed his teaching, a jest which is itself charged with experience, and be- hind which one sees arising in all its ambiguous splendor the archetype of the anima.
Observing him, seeing him teach and then relax in a more intimate circle, I registered during this week in Basel many aspects of his being and appearance, many disparate expressions.
Under the high forehead of the thinker, the planes of his face are ﬁrm and full; the gray eyes seem suddenly curiously small and made for gimlet scrutiny; at other moments they are chieﬂy mischievous, and the face becomes that of a confessor-accomplice, a priest who enjoys life, suddenly red in the face with a hearty laugh; but the proﬁle then calls one to order—it is much more serious, angular, and marks the top-level intellectual.
But watching him live, one perceives that these disparate expressions are organized into a coherent whole.
One feels that he denies none of them, that being and appearance (the self and the persona) have found their modus vivendi, that his teaching about “integrating all the functions” to form a totality is not book knowledge but lived, which amounts to aﬃrming that he belongs not only among the scholars but among the sages.
I knew Jung from his books and I had met him personally.
But during this week passed in his company I feel I have discovered him. To tell the truth, I have made two discoveries.
First of all, I have been struck by the strongly concrete character of this man and of his thinking.
Secondly, I have realized all he owes to his mingling with the “primitives”; those journeys have not been pic- turesque accidents in his life; they are among the nutritive substances of his thought.
I would add that these two points are intimately connected.
The concreteness stands out every moment from his way of expounding ideas, laying emphasis on the facts, his gestures sober and restrained but felt to be charged with energy and asking only to go ahead uncurbed.
This is especially visible when he describes one of his African scenes; in fact he acts it out in abbreviated form, he makes it visible.
There was that anecdote to illustrate the fact that primitives do not know will-power in the sense that we un-
derstand it; they must ﬁrst mobilize the needful energy for an action and this is the purpose served by certain precise incantatory rituals.
For example, the boy who is charged with carrying the mail to town (who knows how many leagues away!) remains passively sitting when the European quietly asks him to perform this service and oﬀers to reward him; it is as if he did not understand.
But the sorcerer passes by, takes the case in hand—and the whip too!—starts dancing the “running dance” around the boy; the tribe joins in, the boy is drawn into the circle and ﬁnally, as if shot from a sling, is oﬀ; and he runs at that! All was reproduced before us; we saw it.
But this play of gesture to demonstrate and explain ﬂourishes yet more freely in familiar conversation.
We were speaking one evening of “telepathic” dreams where, between persons who are emotionally close, a mutual unconscious communication and penetration appears to take place.
Jung ﬁnally, to sum up his thoughts on the matter, acted them out as follows: with brief, ﬁrm gestures he touched ﬁrst my forehead, then his own, and thirdly drew a great circle with his hand in the space between us; the three motions underscored the three clauses of this statement; “In short, one doesn’t dream here, and one doesn’t dream here, one dreams there.”
And there the hand kept turning, like the above-mentioned sling and the idea, like the messenger, was launched.
I have said that this concreteness is tied up with Jung’s African experience.
I came to see that he had a feeling of concreteness about the soul; when he entitles a book Wirklichkeit der Seele (Reality of the Soul) it is no vain expression.
To be sure, he had been convinced by his patients of this concrete aspect of the things of the psyche, but certainly the “primitives” brought him into touch with it in a closer and more convincing way, for this is how they feel.
When he was telling me the other day, at Dr. von Sury’s, about these “ancestral spirits,” which fall upon one on return to one’s birthplace, and which he himself feels whenever he returns to Basel, I recognized that these “spirits” had weight, like the atmosphere during a thunderstorm.
And when he was led by this reﬂection to study, on the wall, the genealogical tree of the von Sury family, I realized how he felt those roots digging down and holding fast in an earth that was real and solid.
This concreteness of Jung’s was part of his make-up. In his childhood recollections he tells us of the torments he went through over mathematics, especially over algebraic abstractions, which he found incomprehensible.
To make sense out of them, he had to put back numbers in place of letters.
The simple equation a = b infuriated him and seemed a rank deception: since a is one thing and b is another, it is a lie to say they are equal.
If this was an inborn disposition of his mind, it could not but be reinforced and justiﬁed in his eyes by his fertilizing contacts with “primitive mentality.”
The academic mind expected a mapmaker; and it ﬁnds itself face to face with an explorer who emerges from
the brush armed, weighed down, and solidly swathed in magniﬁcent vines and creepers, trailing with him all the odors of the forest.
Carl Jung, C.G. Jung Speaking: Interviews and Encounters, Pages 76-81